The dangers of thirdhand smoke

In the past, health authorities have raised awareness regarding secondhand smoke and its effects. However, the effect of a person's smoking habits doesn’t end when others inhale the fumes from a smoker's cigarette. Researchers from Yale University released studies on the so-called "thirdhand smoke.” In this blog, Dr. Lisa M. Cannon explains how it can affect people and the environment.

Image source: Bbc.co.uk

Image source: Medicalnewstoday.com

Thirdhand smoke isn't really smoke. These are tobacco contaminants that may remain in surfaces walls, carpets, beddings, and even in clothing. Places such as bars and movie theatres that can still smell like cigarette smoke even when no one is smoking indoors may most likely have these harmful particles. A home with one smoker can have nicotine and other toxic residues that can expose other residents to potentially dangerous fumes. As this is still a developing study, researchers are still considering whether e-cigarettes have the same effect.

Dr. Lisa M. Cannon shares that, according to the study, non-smokers can be exposed to nicotine and other toxic chemicals from public spaces that they could be sharing with smokers. What these researchers even discovered is that a person could have been exposed to up to 10 cigarettes in less than two hours. Thirdhand smoke can also be transmitted through a person's clothing. These particles can only be eliminated through meticulous and regular cleaning. Children and infants are most prone to the harmful effects. While the study is still developing, scientists are still gathering data on how it can damage a person's health.

Dr. Lisa M. Cannon is a board-certified physician who has been practicing for more than 15 years. She graduated with a degree in medicine from New York Medical College and completed her fellowship in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine at the renowned Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. For more updates, visit Dr. Lisa M. Cannon on Twitter.

REPOST: Healthier lungs in California kids after pollution controls

A study conducted in California found better lung function among kids as the state's air quality improved.  This Reuters article provides the details.

(Reuters Health) - Doctors have long predicted that less air pollution will produce healthier lungs. Now a first-of-its-kind study of 2,120 children in southern California has documented dramatically better lung function growth as air quality has improved.

       

Image source: 5minutesformom.com

Over a 13-year period, the proportion of children with poor lung capacity and lung health fell by half as levels of nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter dropped. The gains were seen both in youngsters who had asthma and in those who did not.

“It certainly supports the efforts that have been made over 40 years to improve air quality,” chief author Dr. James Gauderman of the Department of Preventive Medicine at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles told Reuters Health. “We would expect improvements in other urban centers to produce similar improvements in children’s health.”

The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, complements research showing that childhood lung function deteriorates and the risk of asthma rises as pollution levels rise.

"This is an association study, so there's always a question of cause and effect. Maybe these people got healthier on their own, ate better diets. You can never say it's an absolute proof," said Dr. Norman H. Edelman, senior consultant for scientific affairs at the American Lung Association.

        

Image source: Inhabitat.com

"But it's not a standalone study. It's based on older studies that show an association between the degree of air pollution and lung function in kids. This turns around and looks at improvement," he told Reuters Health.

Gauderman and his colleagues examined the long-term effects in children by studying three groups during three time periods between 1994 and 2011. Typically, the children entered the study around age 11 and were followed for four years, a period when the lungs are developing rapidly. All lived in the Los Angeles area, a region of the U.S. known for air pollution problems, which have been abating as a result of strict state controls.

“We looked at the proportion of children whose lung function was below 80 percent of normal. That’s a cutoff a physician will often use to flag a person for a possible issue with their lungs,” Gauderman said. While 7.9 percent of children fell into that category in 1998, the proportion had dropped to 3.6 percent by 2011.

“We certainly suspected that improving air quality would improve children’s health,” Gauderman said. “We were surprised by the magnitude of the effect that we’ve seen.”

"What's news about this is the large magnitude of the effect, from 8 percent down to 4 percent," said Edelman, who was not connected to research. "Asthma is present in 10 percent of the population and that's a major health problem. If a percentage of those kids is going to have worse asthma because the air pollution has limited their lung growth, that's a big deal."

During the study years, the air improved “dramatically,” Gauderman’s team writes in their report. For example, in 1994-1997, each cubic meter of air in one of the most-polluted communities, Mira Loma, had 31.5 micrograms of small particles called PM2.5 that penetrate deep into the lungs. By 2007-2010, Mira Loma averaged 17.8 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter of air, a 43 percent decline. All five study sites had significant drops in particle pollution and nitrogen dioxide, they note.

Overall, average lung capacity increased by 91.4 milliliters for every decrease of 14.1 parts per billion in nitrogen dioxide. It rose by 65.5 ml for each decrease of 8.7 micrograms per cubic meter of particle pollution. Significant changes were not linked to ozone levels, but levels of that pollutant have not declined as dramatically over time.

       

Image source: Phytofilter.com

“There were significant effects on lung-function growth in both boys and girls, although the magnitude of the air-pollution effect was significantly larger in boys than in girls,” the researchers conclude.

“We found no significant association between growth in height and change in pollution during the study period, which indicates that our findings on lung-function growth are probably not the result of a secular trend in general development,” they write.

California has stricter pollution controls than the U.S. as a whole, but Edelman said even the federal clean air act has cleaned up a lot of pollution "and this study is part of that. We're making progress. There's still a long way to go. We still have much more unacceptable effects of air pollution than we should have."

Dr. Lisa Marie Cannon is a board certified physician who specializes in pulmonary care.  Visit this Facebook page for more access to resources on related topics.